Lukas Hellum Lilleengen vs Tushar Sharma Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Sharma has claimed 40% of second serve points, and Lilleengen has slightly edged with 41.45%. Could this minor difference impact the match outcome?
• Lilleengen excels in return games, capturing 45.7% of opponents' second serve points recently, compared to Sharma’s 30.77%.
• Both players have shown different aptitude in handling pressure; Sharma saves 42.86% of breakpoints, while Lilleengen successfully saves 55.71%.
• Over the past year, Lilleengen has demonstrated a higher winning percentage of 42.86% compared to Sharma’s 33.33%. Does this suggest Lilleengen might prevail?
• Considering surface performance, Sharma has a 15% success rate on Hard courts, whereas Lilleengen boasts a 52% success on Clay, their best.
• Both competitors have mostly played in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K over the last year, with Lilleengen registering a higher success rate of 42.86% compared to Sharma’s 33.33%.
• Sharma has faced opponents of negligible ranking, while Lilleengen has battled players averaging a rank of 175.61, perhaps indicating a different level of competitive experience.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Lilleengen has a 25% success rate compared to Sharma’s 0%, hinting at a probable advantage.
• Break point conversion in recent form favors Lilleengen at 28.57%, dramatically higher than Sharma’s 0% efficiency, indicating better execution under high stakes.

Editorial Prediction (June 15, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing second serve performance in recent form, Lilleengen has a slight edge over Sharma, which may contribute to their advantage in this head-to-head match-up.

The return game stats heavily favor Lilleengen, as they have shown superior competence in both first and second serve returns. This aspect marks a significant edge in play.

Lilleengen demonstrates a more robust ability to handle pressure, given their higher breakpoint save percentage, which could become critical as the match intensity rises.

While Sharma predominantly excels on Hard courts, Lilleengen's stronger performance on Clay surfaces could lend them additional confidence going into this face-off.

The consistency in tournament participation and match-winning percentages further illustrates Lilleengen's competitive experience surpasses Sharma's.

Considering these comparative statistics and performance insights, Lilleengen appears to be the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.